• Certification
    ISO9001/ISO14001/IATF16949
    ROHS/UL/REACH/FDA
    Mail Contact
    kennis.zhu@elaplus.cc

    +86 18116225322

    Welcome to be our distributor

Industry Application

Home » Industry Application »

Does Foam Material Have to Replace All Potting Adhesives for Battery Module Weight Reduction? Differentiate Filling, Thermal and Structural Functions First

2026-11-02

Battery module lightweighting cannot be achieved by simply replacing conventional solid potting adhesives entirely with low-density foam materials. Foam filling, thermal conduction, structural bonding and insulation protection serve distinct functions. The correct approach is to define zones for cavity filling, heat transfer or load bearing, then adopt a combined solution of PUR 1685 foamed polyurethane, lightweight silicone or standard thermally conductive materials accordingly. Foam Filling for Battery Packs This is one common selection pitfall in battery PACK lightweighting: Lower density does not mean suitability for every adhesive application point. 1. Why Traditional Full-Cavity Solid Potting Adds Weight Suppose a battery module requires filling a large internal cavity. If high-density solid potting material is used for the whole space, greater adhesive volume brings substantial weight gain. For new energy vehicles, drones, mobile energy storage and similar applications, weight directly affects: Therefore, for large-volume potting, a key question arises: does every part of this adhesive really need to be high-density solid material? 2. Four Core Functions of Adhesives Inside Battery Modules 3. Why Foam Potting Works Well for Large-Volume, Non-Critical Thermal Zones Foam materials contain numerous controlled closed cells. At equal volume, less raw material is consumed, which reduces potting weight. PUR 1685 is a 1:1 two-component foamed polyurethane system. Its density after foaming is approximately 0.2 g/cm³ with UL94 V-0 flame retardancy, designed for large-volume filling scenarios requiring lightweighting such as battery modules. This material is engineered to fill large spaces with less material mass, rather than pursuing maximum thermal conductivity. 4. Why Foam Adhesive Cannot Directly Replace Thermal Gel They are designed for different missions. Material Type Primary Function Key Indicators Foamed Polyurethane Lightweight filling Density, flame retardancy, cushioning Thermal Gel Thermal interface Thermal conductivity, BLT, thermal resistance Thermally Conductive Potting Compound Encapsulation + heat dissipation Thermal conductivity, insulation, flowability…

More

Why Creepage and Partial Discharge Still Occur After High-Voltage Module Potting: Full Filling Does Not Equal Reliable Insulation

2026-11-02

Even fully potted high-voltage modules may suffer creepage, partial discharge or even dielectric breakdown. Adhesive coverage alone does not guarantee a continuous, defect-free insulation path inside the assembly. Air gaps at pin roots, electric field concentration at sharp edges, interfacial delamination, residual contamination and insufficient effective insulation distance after potting can all initiate high-voltage failures. For 800 V and higher voltage platforms, potting reliability shall not be judged merely by whether the cavity is fully filled. Instead, evaluation should focus on the electric field distribution and insulation path formed between high-voltage potential points. 1. Distinguish Breakdown, Creepage and Partial Discharge First: Dielectric breakdown means the insulation medium loses its insulating capability. Under strong electric fields, a conductive channel forms within the originally insulating region, which may directly cause a short circuit between high voltage and low voltage. Second: Creepage refers to conductive paths developing along insulation surfaces. Moisture, contamination and ionic residues raise the creepage risk. Even if high-voltage terminals are covered by adhesive, unstable surface or interfacial conditions do not eliminate creepage hazards. Third: Partial discharge takes place locally within the insulation system. It may not trigger immediate complete breakdown. Nevertheless, repeated discharge over time progressively erodes local insulation and eventually leads to severe electrical failure. In short: No short circuit does not mean the insulation system is free from degradation. 2. Why Tiny Internal Voids Matter Greatly for High-Voltage Potting For high-voltage potting, the primary hazard is not limited to large bubbles visible to the naked eye. More risky defects often include: These locations form a discontinuous structure: solid insulation – air – solid insulation. Electric field redistribution occurs accordingly. The real goal of high-voltage potting is continuous insulation, rather than a visually full appearance. 3. Why Pin Tips and Sharp Corners on Busbars Are High-Risk Zones Electric…

More

Why Rain & Light Sensor Sensitivity Drops After Dispensing Adhesive: Transparency Is Not Enough — Bubbles, Adhesive Thickness and Optical Bonding Are the Key

2026-11-02

When the sensitivity of a rain & light sensor declines after dispensing transparent adhesive, the first check should target the optical interface for bubbles, local voids, uneven adhesive thickness and surface contamination, rather than merely checking whether the adhesive is “transparent enough”. For optical sensors, the adhesive layer itself forms part of the light path; any discontinuous interface may alter light propagation. Rain & light sensors form a coupled optical interface with the windshield through their optical structure. One function of transparent gel/silicone is to eliminate irregular air gaps between the sensor and glass. Poor assembly alone can lead to abnormal sensor operation. 1. Why Does the Sensor Become Less Responsive Even With Transparent Adhesive? First: Visual transparency does not guarantee an intact optical interface. A transparent adhesive layer may contain: It may still look clear to the naked eye. But for light travelling inside the sensor, these areas create new refraction and reflection interfaces. Therefore, the main risk for rain & light sensors is not simply “non-transparent adhesive”, but unintended air layers and inconsistent interfaces within the light path. 2. How Can a Tiny Bubble Interfere With Detection? Air and transparent adhesive have different optical properties. Under designed conditions, light is expected to travel continuously: Sensor optical surface → Transparent adhesive layer → Windshield If an air bubble forms inside the adhesive, an extra interface is introduced. This changes local light behaviour including: Ultimately, the signal received by the photodetector will be altered. For rain & light sensors, “no large visible bubbles” is insufficient. Special attention must be paid to the optically active area for: 3. Does More Adhesive Ensure Stable Optical Performance? No. Over-dispensing may cause: Insufficient dispensing, on the other hand, may result in: The target is a stable, continuous and uniform optical adhesive layer, not simply…

More

Why Temperature Resistance Alone Is Not Enough for Pressure Sensor Potting: High-Temperature Performance, Low CTE and Low Stress Must Be Evaluated Together

2026-11-02

The potting of pressure sensors should not be judged merely by the “maximum temperature resistance in °C”. Long-term reliability is actually determined by CTE, modulus of the cured compound, substrate matching, thermal conductivity requirements and stress induced by temperature cycling. Especially for assemblies combining aluminum housing, ceramic, PCB and sensing die, the fact that an adhesive can cure at high temperatures does not guarantee reliability after long-term thermal cycling. Pressure Sensor Potting 1. Why Are Pressure Sensors Particularly Vulnerable to Thermal Stress? First: Thermal expansion of internal materials is inconsistent. A pressure sensor may incorporate multiple components: These components expand to different extents as temperature rises. If the potting adhesive features high thermal expansion and high stiffness, thermal deformation will be converted into mechanical stress. Second: Pressure sensors require not only protection but also stable measurement performance. General electronic modules mainly focus on basic functionality. For sensors, extra concerns arise: Will the encapsulation affect the sensitive structure and output stability? Therefore, “harder equals better” is not a universal rule. 2. What Do Temperature Resistance, Tg, CTE and Modulus Respectively Address? Parameter Core Question to Answer Risks of Improper Selection Operating Temperature Whether the adhesive can withstand the service temperature long-term Aging, performance degradation Tg Whether the material state changes drastically upon temperature rise Variation of modulus and dimensional stability CTE How significantly the adhesive expands and contracts with temperature Interfacial stress, cracking, delamination Modulus / Hardness How much stress the adhesive transfers to components Stress damage to sensing die and solder joints Thermal Conductivity Whether heat can be dissipated efficiently Local overheating Adhesion Whether interfacial bonding remains intact after thermal cycling Delamination, water ingress To sum up: Temperature resistance answers whether the adhesive can survive at a given temperature; CTE and modulus determine whether temperature fluctuations will damage the assembly…

More

Why Sensitive MEMS Chips Are Better Protected by Low-Stress Fluorosilicone Gel

2026-09-09

Packaging materials for MEMS pressure sensors must satisfy multiple requirements simultaneously: low stress, moisture resistance, electrical insulation, protection for gold wires and solder joints, and medium resistance in practical environments. Since MEMS operates relying on tiny mechanical structures, excessive material modulus, curing shrinkage and thermal expansion stress may cause zero drift or signal variation. ELAPLUS FSGEL 3200C is a one-component thixotropic fluorosilicone gel, which is suitable for flexible, low-stress and medium-resistant protection of MEMS chips, gold wires and sensitive electronic areas. It is NOT designed for primary structural bonding of magnetic steel, housings and other load-bearing structures. When packaging sensitive chips such as MEMS pressure sensors and micro-pressure sensors, the core principle for material selection is not “the harder and firmer, the better”. Instead, materials shall provide moisture-proof, anti-corrosion, oil/gas and chemical medium resistance, gold wire and solder joint protection, while minimizing mechanical stress exerted on chips by packaging materials. That is why for certain MEMS sensor protection scenarios, soft, low-stress fluorosilicone gel is preferable compared with traditional high-modulus rigid potting materials. Take ELAPLUS FSGEL 3200C one-component thixotropic fluorosilicone gel as an example. Its main function in application is not to fix the housing structure, but to form a flexible protective layer over MEMS chips, gold wires, solder joints and sensitive electronic regions. In short: The real challenge of MEMS packaging is not merely “covering the chip”, but protecting it without interfering with its sensing function. I. Why Are MEMS Sensors More “Vulnerable to Adhesives” Than Ordinary PCBs? For ordinary PCB potting, we usually expect materials to fix components, resist moisture and water, provide insulation and resist vibration. However, MEMS devices have one special requirement: They work based on micro-deformation. MEMS stands for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems. Take MEMS pressure sensors as an example. Pressure acts on the internal sensitive structure of…

More

How to Select Potting Compound for Liquid‑Level Sensors? “Water‑Resistant” Does Not Equal “Oil‑Resistant”

2026-09-08

When selecting potting and sealing materials for liquid‑level sensors, the primary question shall be: What medium will the sensor be immersed in long‑term? Instead of simply asking: “Is this adhesive waterproof?” Water, engine oil, fuel, coolant, brake fluid and other industrial media exert completely different effects on polymer materials. ELAPLUS industrial sensor solutions treat oil‑resistant sealing as an independent application category, separate from bulk potting, pin sealing and substrate fixation. Six Conditions to Confirm Before Material Selection for Liquid‑level Sensors Condition Rationale Medium name Determines chemical compatibility of material Medium temperature High temperature accelerates material aging Immersion duration Short‑term exposure ≠ long‑term immersion Presence of pressure Affects medium penetration at interfaces Housing material Influences bonding performance Chip‑to‑adhesive contact status Determines stress‑related material requirements Why 24‑hour Immersion Test Is Not Sufficient for Final Conclusion Materials may suffer liquid absorption, swelling, softening, hardening or bond strength degradation in contact with media. Many of these changes do not fully occur within 24 hours. For long‑service‑life liquid‑level sensors, performance comparison shall cover: before aging → during aging → after aging. Key Inspection Items for Media‑Resistance Test Test Item Observation Points Appearance Cracking, blistering Mass Liquid absorption Volume Swelling Hardness Softening / hardening Bonding Interface degradation Resistance Insulation property shift Sensor output Functional variation Industry Pitfall A typical engineering mistake: passing water‑immersion test and then claiming general media resistance. This is insufficient for real‑world applications. Valid evaluation must adopt customer’s actual working medium and operating temperature. Scenario‑based Adaptation Fuel‑level, engine‑oil‑level, coolant‑level, water‑tank, urea‑level and industrial chemical liquid‑level sensors shall all be validated against real service media. FAQ on Potting Compounds for Liquid‑level Sensors Q1: Does water‑resistant silicone guarantee engine‑oil resistance? A: No direct inference can be drawn. Validation with target medium is mandatory. Q2: Are oil‑resistant materials automatically suitable for fuel exposure? A: Not necessarily. Oil…

More

How to Select Encapsulation Materials for MEMS? Is FSGEL 3200C Fluorosilicone Gel Suitable for MEMS Chip Protection?

2026-09-08

MEMS encapsulation materials shall balance low‑stress performance, environmental protection, media resistance and precision dispensing capability. For pressure sensors, automotive sensors and industrial MEMS devices, soft gel can be adopted for local protection when rigid potting materials may impose mechanical stress on sensitive structures. ELAPLUS FSGEL 3200C is a one‑component thixotropic fluorosilicone gel. It delivers flexible coating for MEMS chips, solder joints and lead areas, and is applicable for sensor encapsulation exposed to harsh media such as oil, fuel, solvents and moisture. This marks one major difference between MEMS encapsulation and ordinary PCB potting: MEMS encapsulation is not merely “sealing the chip”. It aims to provide protection while minimizing material‑induced interference to sensitive structures. Why Low‑stress Materials Are Required for MEMS Encapsulation MEMS stands for Micro‑Electro‑Mechanical System. Such devices integrate micro‑mechanical structures, sensing elements, electrodes, solder joints or gold wires to detect external signals such as pressure, temperature and acceleration. Therefore, MEMS chips are vulnerable not only to moisture and corrosion, but also to mechanical stress originating from encapsulation materials. Taking MEMS pressure sensors as an example, high‑modulus encapsulants or materials with significant shrinkage and expansion during curing and thermal cycling may alter the original stress state of sensitive structures. Potential consequences include: ‑ Zero‑point drift of chips ‑ Deviation of output signals ‑ Shift in sensitivity ‑Long‑term stress applied to gold wires and solder joints ‑ Reliability failures after thermal cycling Accordingly, for certain MEMS applications, encapsulation material evaluation shall not focus solely on hardness or bonding strength. Of greater importance is whether the material can offer environmental protection while mitigating mechanical disturbance to sensitive structures. What Is FSGEL 3200C? FSGEL 3200C is a one‑component thixotropic fluorosilicone gel for flexible protection of sensitive electronic components and sensors. Unlike conventional high‑hardness potting materials, it remains soft after curing and forms cushioning…

More

How to Select Potting Compound for Steering‑Angle Sensors: Positional Accuracy Matters More Than Ultra‑High Bonding Strength

2026-09-03

For adhesives used in steering‑angle, position and magnetic‑encoding sensors, fixation is not the only priority. It is critical to maintain stable relative component positions after curing, vibration exposure and temperature variation. Even if no delamination occurs, large cure shrinkage of potting material may lead to position deviation, zero‑point shift or output errors. Material Requirements for Different Zones of Steering‑Angle Sensors Zone Key Requirements Magnet Stable positioning Hall / magneto‑sensitive component Low‑stress fixation PCB Moisture resistance PIN pins Waterproofing Housing Sealing performance Wiring harness Vibration resistance Why Dimensional Stability Is Critical The theoretical gap between magnet and Hall chip is fixed. A dimension change of 0.X mm in potting layer may be negligible for general mechanical parts, yet it requires thorough validation for precision magnetic‑field measurement applications. Therefore, evaluation criteria shall go beyond bonding strength, and focus on geometric‑position stability after curing. Recommended Comparison Test Items Test Stage Parameters to Record Before potting Initial zero‑point value Post‑curing Cure‑induced offset High‑temperature condition Temperature drift Low‑temperature condition Low‑temperature drift Thermal cycling Offset reversibility Post‑vibration test Positional stability Common Industry Pitfalls Many material validations for position sensors only perform pull‑off, shear and water‑resistance tests, while ignoring sensor output measurement. For precision sensors, the ultimate evaluation target shall be actual product functionality. Application‑Oriented Matching Applicable to steering‑angle sensors, magnetic encoders, Hall position detectors, rotary position sensors and similar precision magneto‑sensitive assemblies. FAQ for Steering‑Angle Sensor Adhesives

More

How to Select Potting Compound for TPMS Tire‑Pressure Sensors: Harsh Operating Conditions Inside Tires Are More Complex Than Expected

2026-09-03

Adhesives for TPMS tire‑pressure sensors must cope with far more than water resistance. They also need to withstand continuous vibration generated by tire rotation, thermal cycling, PCB and chip protection, moisture and long‑term mechanical shock. Therefore, TPMS potting shall prioritize low‑stress performance, electrical insulation, vibration resistance and environmental stability, rather than simply selecting materials with maximum hardness. What Components Need Protection Inside TPMS Component Main Risks Material Requirements MEMS chip Stress, moisture Low‑stress protection PCB Vibration, moisture Potting & moisture‑proofing Solder joints Cyclic loading Stress buffering Battery connections Vibration Mechanical fixation Housing Moisture ingress Sealing Why Polyurethane Deserves Consideration If your TPMS requires moderate mechanical protection while avoiding overly rigid high‑modulus epoxy systems, flexible polyurethane potting materials are worth evaluation. For instance, published product information for PUR 1680 covers potting for electronic modules and sensors, delivering insulation, moisture resistance, cushioning and structural protection. PUR 1680 is listed among polyurethane potting options in our sensor solution matrix. Please note: PUR 1680 can be considered as one candidate for sensor potting, but real‑world structural validation is still required for TPMS applications. It does not mean this single grade fits all tire‑pressure sensor projects. Why Blind Pursuit of High Hardness Is Not Recommended for TPMS Sensing chips, PCBs and solder joints do not require the potting material to form a rigid hard shell. What is truly required: ‑ Cushion vibration loads ‑ Block moisture ingress ‑ Avoid introducing excessive stress onto components during temperature swings Common Industry Pitfalls Common Pitfall Associated Risk Only comparing room‑temperature hardness No guarantee of long‑term vibration performance Over‑hard full potting solution May induce extra stress on solder joints Testing only water‑proof performance Thermal cycling performance ignored No real‑world tire‑condition validation Lab test conditions are overly idealized Application‑Oriented Material Matching For in‑tire TPMS, electronic sensor modules near wheel speed assemblies and small…

More

COPYRIGHT ◎ 2023 Elaplus Functional Materials Co. LTD

Mail Mail
eddie.zhang@elaplus.cc
 WhatsApp WhatsApp
+86 155 1820 1251
WeChat WeChat
WeChat

sample request

We will reply within 24 working hours. If urgent, please help us to contact through email： kennis.zhu@elaplus.cc